BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:icalendar-ruby
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
X-WR-CALNAME:CHC Peer Review Session
X-WR-TIMEZONE:Pacific Time (US & Canada)
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261011T025942Z
UID:tag:localist.com\,2008:EventInstance_52702356171138
DTSTART:20260506T190000Z
DTEND:20260506T200000Z
DESCRIPTION:The CHC Peer Review has the goal of providing the highest quali
 ty constructive feedback to our trainees and faculty to help improve their
  research and chances of funding.\n\nWe meet around 3 weeks before the NIH
  R01 deadlines\, in September (for the October deadline)\, January (for th
 e February deadline) and May (for the June deadline).\n\nFor early career 
 faculty (including postdoctoral fellows\, specialists\, and assistant prof
 essors): We suggest that NIH proposals by early career faculty are welcome
  to go through one or two reviews at the CHC: a concept review and a final
  grant proposal review. The concept review provides a time to discuss the 
 ideas\, specific aims\, and methods of a grant proposal. The proposal shou
 ld not be entirely written at this time (except for aims). Concept reviews
  should be done at least 3 months before the internal UCSF deadlines.\n\nM
 id-career faculty and senior faculty: Peer review is strongly encouraged f
 or grant proposals for mid- career and senior faculty. Think of it as a fr
 ee round of review before it goes to NIH or other reviewers.\n \nIf you ha
 ve questions or to RVSP\, please contact Dina Freij (Dina.Freij@ucsf.edu).
   A confidential agenda will be sent only to those who RSVP prior to the m
 eeting.
GEO:37.763013;-122.389519
LOCATION:Pritzker Building\, Room 1412
SUMMARY:CHC Peer Review Session
URL;VALUE=URI:https://calendar.ucsf.edu/event/chcreview
CATEGORIES:Professional Development
CATEGORIES:Research & Academia
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20261011T025942Z
UID:tag:localist.com\,2008:EventInstance_53826394419982
DTSTART:20260908T210000Z
DTEND:20260908T220000Z
DESCRIPTION:The CHC Peer Review has the goal of providing the highest quali
 ty constructive feedback to our trainees and faculty to help improve their
  research and chances of funding.\n\nWe meet around 3 weeks before the NIH
  R01 deadlines\, in September (for the October deadline)\, January (for th
 e February deadline) and May (for the June deadline).\n\nFor early career 
 faculty (including postdoctoral fellows\, specialists\, and assistant prof
 essors): We suggest that NIH proposals by early career faculty are welcome
  to go through one or two reviews at the CHC: a concept review and a final
  grant proposal review. The concept review provides a time to discuss the 
 ideas\, specific aims\, and methods of a grant proposal. The proposal shou
 ld not be entirely written at this time (except for aims). Concept reviews
  should be done at least 3 months before the internal UCSF deadlines.\n\nM
 id-career faculty and senior faculty: Peer review is strongly encouraged f
 or grant proposals for mid- career and senior faculty. Think of it as a fr
 ee round of review before it goes to NIH or other reviewers.\n \nIf you ha
 ve questions or to RVSP\, please contact Dina Freij (Dina.Freij@ucsf.edu).
   A confidential agenda will be sent only to those who RSVP prior to the m
 eeting.
GEO:37.763013;-122.389519
LOCATION:Pritzker Building\, Room 1412
SUMMARY:CHC Peer Review Session
URL;VALUE=URI:https://calendar.ucsf.edu/event/chcreview
CATEGORIES:Professional Development
CATEGORIES:Research & Academia
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR